However, Tennessee’s Speaker of the House, Cameron Sexton, expressed staunch disapproval of this initiative. “They don’t have the capability of doing referendums like this. We don’t do referendums like this on the ballot; never have in Tennessee’s history,” he stated. His remarks reflect a broader sentiment among state GOP leadership that local measures to alter gun laws overstep their authority and contradict state law.

In a joint statement issued alongside Lt. Gov. Randy McNally, Sexton threatened to withhold state-shared sales tax revenues from Memphis if they proceed with placing the referendum on the ballot. Both legislators argue that Memphis officials are trying to bypass state laws with what they term as “political maneuvers.” They argue that the city should enact new laws through the standard legislative process rather than trying to conduct a referendum for such matters.

Defenders of the proposed measures, such as State Rep. Jesse Chism of Memphis, contend that the referendum is a necessary step for community safety. “It’s always disappointing when you hear something punitive toward a city or a county that’s trying to protect itself,” he shared. Chism believes that addressing gun violence is critical and highlights that the proposed measures reflect the community’s desire to pursue meaningful change.

Adding to the tension, House Minority Leader Karen Camper also reached out to the GOP leaders, urging them to reconsider their threat against Memphis. She stressed that the city is simply trying to act in the best interest of its residents, who have voiced their concerns over gun violence. “These proposals represent the will of the people,” she stated, arguing that punishing the city for exercising its rights sets a risky precedent for local governance.

The proposed referendum and the subsequent reactions underscore a broader conflict in Tennessee over gun rights and local control. While supporters assert that the measures will help enhance safety, opponents argue that these initiatives would infringe on individual freedoms and are unnecessary given existing laws.

In an interesting twist, the Tennessee Coordinator of Elections, Mark Goins, intervened by sending a letter to Shelby County Election Commissioners, stating that the referendum could not be added to the ballot because it violates state law. According to Goins, the Memphis City Council did not meet the required deadlines to impose such questions for voter consideration. This ruling effectively sidelined the proposed measures from the November ballot, leading to further speculation about possible legal challenges.

The chairman of the Shelby County Election Commission confirmed that he would not proceed with placing the referendum on the ballot, speculating that this issue will likely head to court as city leaders explore their legal options. Local officials remain determined, asserting that there is an overwhelming desire among city residents to vote on this pressing issue.

As of now, Memphis is caught in the crossfire of a political battle that resonates deeply within the community, entangled in questions of governance, safety, and accountability. Some residents advocate for the chance to vote on significant changes they feel are necessary to combat rising gun violence, while others are concerned about the implications of everyday decisions being dictated by state government.

The question remains whether Memphis can navigate this predicament effectively. The stakes are high, and the upcoming weeks will likely see intensified discussions among city leaders, state officials, and community advocates. With the possibility of court proceedings looming, it’s clear that the debate over gun control in Memphis is far from over.

As tensions rise and discussions continue, all eyes will be on Memphis as the city grapples with its rights and responsibilities in the face of state opposition.

Author: HERE Memphis